[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Regional Business News
regarding the 2010 Olympics
in British Columbia, Canada
OlyBLOG is for businesses across Canada,
especially in Vancouver / Whistler and throughout B.C. We also
hope companies in Alberta and United States (i.e. Washington, Oregon,
Idaho, Montana and California) will find OlyBLOG interesting and informative.
Originally published April 1, 2004
Terry Wright VANOC VP
VRCA invited Terry Wright former Vice President, Bid Development and Operations
with the Vancouver 2010 Bid Corporation to speak to members at VRCA
headquarters. All in all it was a good presentation. Terry obviously knows
his stuff from the inside out.
It was a reasonable turnout, but there were more empty seats than I expected
considering Wright's stature and experience at the podium. According to
VRCA staff many more members reserved a seat than actually showed up.
Wright shared quite a bit of good information, unfortunately his presentation
ran a little long and many of us rushed off to salvage what was left of
the business morning as soon as he wrapped it up. Some even left during
his presentation, which was unfortunate because the question period at
the end was informative and interesting.
With a little research, most in attendance would have had a better appreciation
of what Wright was talking about, but many in the crowd are busy running
businesses and don't have time to root through documents trying to figure
how to leverage Olympic momentum. One of the most interesting questions
asked after Wright spoke was how smaller enterprises would share in the
wealth. The question came from a member who noticed in Wright's presentation
that perimeter/security/fencing requirements were going to be substantial.
Wright rifled through a list of other products and services (most were
not directly related to construction) that would also be needed, but at
the end of it I don't think he relayed effectively enough how SMBs (small
and mid size business) would play a more integral part. Not sure if it
was his delivery or more the fact there really isn't a whole lot for the
people who were in the room to benefit from in direct relation to Olympic
Our research indicates about half of the architects and construction companies
in the GVRD mistakenly believe they won't benefit from an association
with the Olympics. Consequently many expressed they are NOT interested
in pursuing 2010 strategies. Wright had a perfect opportunity and did
little to convince doubters otherwise, which is a shame because the economic
potential is great, but not in the way most companies realize.
An interesting trend that bubbled to the surface throughout his presentation
was that many products and services would be supplied by foreign companies.
It was a little unsettling listening to Wright explain that only the 'best'
experts in the world were being hired to design 2010 Olympic facilities
and structures, but that only a very small portion of these experts would
be Canadian. The IOC justifies it by claiming they don't want to reinvent
the wheel. Apparently Canadians can supply the brawn, but when it comes
to the brains we have to order out. It's even more disappointing when
you also consider that due to the shortage of skilled tradespeople in
BC we might have to look outside our borders to supply the brawn too.
Everyone who was in the room knows how the 'expert syndrome' works. Once
you have your 'expert foot' in the door you have tremendous influence
regarding who builds to your specifications. It's easy to argue at the
end of the day "Of course it doesn't work. You used my expertise,
but not my people. If you would have used the team I wanted we wouldn't
have these problems." Unfortunately, it's not a bad argument because
it's partially true. John Furlong, CEO VANOC
talks about inclusiveness. Well inclusiveness starts at the top and weaves
its way through the entire system. It's not a bottom up process.
I know everyone wants to be upstanding and stay positive about the Olympics,
but the challenges described above are common in the Olympic arena and
they have to be addressed early because later in the game finger pointing
runs amok. An example Wright used referenced hiring foreign expertise
to design the luge track. The German designer they picked tabled a design
that created G forces of 6.2 on two of the corners. Experience tells us
that forces above 4.5 puts extreme pressure on the ice and breaks it down.
According to Wright the human body can handle 6.2, but the ice can't,
especially after repeated runs. As I listened all I could think of was
maybe we should hire a Canadian architectural and engineering team to
come up with a luge design that is more realistic. After all, more of
Canada is perpetually covered in ice than five Germanys combined. We know
ice. We can buy the track knowledge and study past designs as well as
anyone. In fact we can start by knocking on Alberta's door. A good plan
would have been to 'contract' the highly specialized expertise, but only
in a vertical consulting scope, and not such a broad design capacity as
they've chosen to do. Keep design in Canada. Maybe Canadian engineers
can also develop denser ice that won't break down so easily. Can you imagine
the excitement of a faster slide? It wouldn't make much difference for
TV viewers, but it would certainly add a little excitement in the sled
and keep those Lycra-clad tobogganers on their toes. Ice on steroids.
Bring on 6.2 Gs.
During his presentation Wright referred to the challenges Athens is currently
experiencing. He talked about the construction chaos in Greece, which
is a serious problem (see below), and at another point in his presentation
he spoke of the cost of tickets for the events in 2010. It went a bit
off track when a member asked about access to blocks of tickets and if
he would be allotted the same access as much larger companies who paid
more to sit at the head table. The question basically was, would the SMB
be locked out of the running because he wasn't a sponsor or supplier?
The short answer is yes, but honestly, I couldn't exactly follow the lengthy
explanation from the podium even though I know the answer is yes. The
reality is that the pot is big, but it takes much more money than the
average SMB will ever be able to ante up. Not only will SMBs not be able
to afford it, they won't have the access even if they could. Wright did
a pretty good end run to soften the blow. He almost had me convinced it
was a non issue.
At one point Keith Sashaw graciously
jumped in and bailed Terry out when he started going in circles regarding
a question I asked about gouging. Keith was on his game and smoothed things
out quickly. I brought up the point that gouging goes on in many sectors
of the Olympics including ticket prices, licensing, land taxes, sponsorships,
you name it, the list is endless. My argument was that when the construction
industry wants to get a fair shake for their contribution it's implied
they are gouging, but it's not gouging when everyone else does it. When
everyone else does it it's referred to as opportunity.
I know, I know, I'm a bad guy for being financially motivated, but who
wouldn't look bad compared to the altruism of John Furlong? Unlike John
though I openly admit I'm here to help SMBs mine real gold, and if I do
my job right I'll also end up with a nugget or two myself.
Never trust anyone who downplays their financial motivations. The difference
between me and those on the Olympic side is that my motivations are front
and centre. I openly admit my primary motivation is financial, whereas
John Furlong would like us to believe he's in this mainly to create a
better sports community. I think Furlong is capable of pulling this off,
but I don't buy his posturing. As long as he sees this through to 2010
John Furlong's contract with VANOC guarantees him 1.8 million dollars
in salary alone, so keep this in mind the next time you hear him waxing
altruistically poetic about the community. I want good things for the
community too, we all do, but I would feel much better if his primary
goal was to make this a financial success for everyone, including SMBs.
If Furlong succeeds in this endeavor all the good community stuff will
follow. It worked in Sydney and to a proportionate extent it will work
here too. I've had a good career helping SMBs create wealth and I'm not
about to be thrown off track because the BIG business Olympic machine
makes it seem politically incorrect by virtue of artificially inflated
community spirit. Hopefully, Vancouverites will see through the charade,
but maybe this is why the architectural and construction industries are
already so disenchanted. Even though Dick Pound's public criticism of
Furlong was a bit extreme, I'm beginning to appreciate his point of view.
Many in the Olympic organization would like us to believe they're here
primarily in the spirit of goodwill. Meanwhile property taxes have shot
up 5.8% and houses prices are increasing hundreds of dollars every day
in direct relation to the Olympics. This is gouging at a subversive level.
Drastic increases like this are not good for the community because when
the crash comes the effects are catastrophic for all but the most wealthy.
It doesn't matter how you cut it, 'Official Sponsors' with corporate ties
to the Olympic BIG BOX machine will come out of this with a big roll of
bills in their pocket, but it won't necessarily be the same for SMBs unless
VANOC takes very decisive steps early in the planning stages. The only
way most companies are going to share in the wealth is if VANOC creates
and promotes effective trade initiatives with the rest of the world. So
far I haven't heard anything really concrete in this direction.
Of all the people I've seen over the last six months who have given a
2010 presentation in an official capacity Terry Wright is the first who
really, albeit inadvertently clarified what I've maintained all along.
SMBs don't have a whole lot to gain regarding the Olympics unless, UNLESS
they leverage alternative strategies.
It's time for VANOC to spell out clearly why we need the architectural
and construction industry to get more excited about the Olympics. Going
for gold 'medals' and a few new sports facilities aren't good enough reasons
because the price is too steep. SMBs need real gold to counterbalance
being subjected to having to do business in an Olympic region. If the
design and construction industry can deliver on time and budget and VANOC
orchestrates strong trade initiatives, everyone, including SMBs across
all sectors (construction too) will share the wealth. If VANOC fumbles,
the only companies to prosper will be BIG business and those who actually
provide a direct service or product to the Olympics. The supplier list
is smaller than you think, but these companies will be very vocal in their
support, so don't get caught up in their noise because it will be at your
expense. If you have to pay higher taxes and conform to stricter municipal
regulations you should get something out of it too. Considering that Vancouver
is such a strong independent business community I'm surprised associations
like the Chamber of Commerce and Board of Trade aren't demanding more
information. Everyone voices strong objections to Walmart or Home Depot,
but when it comes to BIG business Olympic strategy they seem to be uncharacteristically
We've done extensive research and spoken to architects and construction
companies throughout the GVRD and the one resounding message we're getting
from SMBs is that they don't see how they can compete so they aren't even
going to try. Unbelievably, some in the design and construction industry
actually tell us it's too early and they won't get in the race for a few
years. One architect even told us he wouldn't consider anything for six
years. We reminded him the Olympics were in six years and he corrected
himself and said, "oh, then maybe sooner."
No one is suggesting a small or even mid size company is going to win
a large contract. That's reserved for the companies who can deliver on
a large scale, but if they were at the VRCA meeting they would have heard
Keith Sashaw talk about opportunities to build what he feels to be a myriad
of small projects that will start a few years out and continue throughout
the Games. Unfortunately, by the time most companies get in the game the
race will be over.
Realistically, even when the projects Sashaw is talking about come to
fruition it's still not enough to justify the expense of having to operate
a business in an Olympic region, but there are other ways to leverage
Olympic momentum. In regard to veiled threats levied at the construction
industry regarding gouging in reference to the price of concrete and steel,
I haven't heard anyone on the Olympic side talking seriously about using
structural wood to build Olympic facilities. Wood is one of BC's most
valued natural resources. The South Surrey Arena and Abbotsford Rec Centre
use structural wood. Check out the Lubor
Trubka architectural site to get a feel for what can be done. When
the world thinks of BC this is the 'homegrown' that should come to mind.
No one is suggesting SMBs should jump in with both feet. VANOC isn't saying
it, Terry Wright isn't saying it, Keith Sashaw isn't saying it and I'm
not saying it either. But what I am saying is that companies have to at
least start to prepare to get themselves up to speed. This is a once-in-a-lifetime
opportunity, but not in the way most imagine. The BC construction industry
has been so down trodden over the last few years they're still trying
to pick up the pieces. Rag tag teams might cut it for second rate condo
construction, but the Olympics will put the GVRD under a very bright global
spotlight. It's time to upgrade your CAD software and knock the mud off
your boots. It's an opportunity to salvage a leaky reputation and prove
to Canada and the rest of the world that BC can in fact design and efficiently
build lasting and impressive world class structures.
Take a page from the ROOTS Olympic marketing strategy and stake your claim
before someone else pulls the rug out from under you. The boys from Toronto
are smart and have already grabbed front page headlines in the Vancouver
Sun to boast of their intentions to not only be involved in 2010, but
also Torino and Beijing. The first companies making noise on our turf
should be local architectural and construction companies, not out-of-province
clothiers. Think BIG Vancouver. Think BIG!
*Ed. Note: We invested over three years and a six-figure budget researching
Olympic organization relationships with sponsors, contractors, suppliers,
partners, etc. The results surprised us too -- mouseover below
Have a comment?
Learn more about the challenges small
businesses face. Leverage
Olympic organizations are
BIG BUSINESS MACHINES that attract corporations like Kodak,
CocaCola, McDonald's, Wal*Mart, etc. Consequently, VANOC (Vancouver
Organizing Committee) will be stretched thin trying to also develop ways
to assist small and midsize businesses leverage Olympic momentum. Surprisingly,
many people don't realize the event can also be lucrative for smaller
businesses including agriculture, manufacturers, entertainment, technology,
retail & obviously tourism, even when they don't have products
or services that appeal to Olympic fans or serve a direct Olympic need.
The information we share here is invaluable in helping
small and midsize businesses leverage Olympic momentum.
Interested in booking a speaking engagement? Advertise on OlyBLOG?
Global Olympic News
2010 News Updates
A view from Australia
Worker's Rights Sportswear
Impact on Community